REDD

Mark Schapiro | Update: Carbon Watch | December 18, 2009

Brazil tells U.S. don't bank on our forests

Brazil and the United States, the two key players in the REDD negotiations, are now squaring off. Negotiations are down to the wire and one major division remains. Hold on as we head into U.N. speak. Here's what is at the heart of the dispute:

Sarah Terry-Cobo | Update: Carbon Watch | December 17, 2009

Does saving trees = reducing emissions?

Andres Cediel | Update: Carbon Watch | December 16, 2009

Native incentives

"Where there are forests, there are indigenous people. Where there are no forests, there are no indigenous people."

Onel Masardule, a Kuna leader from Panama, smiled at the simplicity of his statement. You could read this as part fact, or depending on the results of the current negotiations, part prophecy.

Mark Schapiro | Update: Carbon Watch | December 15, 2009

Forest talks slow over corruption controls

During the last 24 hours of negotiations, a bloc of countries led by Papua New Guinea, with support from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Colombia, have resisted efforts to impose a package of safeguards to ensure the credibility of forest offsets.

The three countries -- each with substantial amounts of uncut forests and a questionable ability to oversee them -- are objecting to three major provisions, according to Greg Picker, a former member of the Australian climate negotiating team and now a consultant on forest issues to the delegation.

Mark Schapiro | Update: Carbon Watch | December 14, 2009

The fate of trees






Syndicate content